What a grant writer costs, and when to hire one
Some links on this page are affiliate links. Disclosure
Before pricing a grant writer, it is worth knowing that writing is rarely the constraint. Most small-shop grant programs fail on research and deadlines, not on prose — and both of those are cheaper to fix.
That said, here is what the arrangements cost and how to structure one.
The four arrangements
Hourly. Straightforward, and the client carries the risk on scope. Works best for defined, bounded pieces — editing a draft, building a budget, reviewing a proposal before submission.
Per project. A flat fee per application. Predictable, and the usual arrangement for a full proposal. What varies enormously is what “a proposal” includes: is the research yours or theirs, who assembles attachments, how many revision rounds, who submits. Two quotes for “a proposal” can describe very different amounts of work.
Retainer. A monthly fee for an agreed volume of work. Sensible once grants are a continuous program rather than an annual scramble, and it is the arrangement that produces the best writing because the consultant learns your organization.
Commission — don’t. See below.
Rates vary widely by region, by the writer’s track record, and by whether federal proposals are involved. Federal work is a different job with a different compliance burden and is priced accordingly. Get at least two quotes; the spread will tell you more about the market in your area than any published figure.
Why commission-based grant writing is a problem
You will be offered it, usually by someone new to the field, and it is worth understanding why to decline.
It is contrary to professional ethical standards. The major fundraising associations hold that fundraising compensation should not be contingent on funds raised. Grant writing sits squarely inside that.
Many funders prohibit it. Using grant funds to pay a percentage to the person who secured them is disallowed under a lot of award terms, and discovering that after the fact is a real problem.
The incentive is wrong. A writer paid on outcome is rewarded for volume and for chasing the largest possible ask, not for fit. Volume applications to poorly matched funders is precisely the behaviour that burns relationships you will want in five years.
The timing does not work. Grant decisions land three to nine months after submission. A commission arrangement means nobody gets paid for most of a year, which selects for people who cannot afford to wait — and produces pressure to submit rather than to submit well.
Pay for the work. The results are the organization’s responsibility.
What to settle before signing
- Scope in applications, not hours, where you can. “Four full proposals and two letters of inquiry” is a clearer contract than a monthly hour count.
- Who does the research. This is the biggest hidden variable. A writer given a qualified funder list is doing half the job of one who has to find the funders too.
- Who assembles attachments. Financials, board lists, 501(c)(3) letters, audited statements. This is unglamorous and takes real time, and it is usually the client’s job — make sure someone knows that.
- Who submits. Portal registrations often require an authorized officer, which is not your consultant.
- What happens to work in progress if the engagement ends. You want the drafts.
- That payment is not contingent on awards. In writing.
The cheaper fix most shops need first
If applications are going out and not landing, adding a better writer often does not change the outcome. Most declines are fit problems, and fit is visible before anyone writes.
Pull the 990 giving history for your last ten applications. Check whether organizations like yours are on those funders’ grant lists, what the median grant was, and whether the list repeats year over year. If most of your applications went to funders who were never going to fund you, that is the thing to fix — and reading a 990-PF covers how, at no cost.
The tooling for that is cheap. Candid’s Foundation Directory is free on site at hundreds of partner libraries. GrantStation is about $199 a year through TechSoup. Our 2026 survey put mean grant research spend at $250 a year for shops under $250K raised, which tells you most of the sector is spending at roughly that level rather than on consultants.
And if the failure is deadlines rather than fit or prose, that is a calendar problem — see the grant reporting calendar that keeps renewals. A missed report costs the renewal, and no writer prevents that.
When a consultant is genuinely the right call
A federal application you have never done. The compliance requirements are a specialism, and a first federal proposal without help is a common and expensive failure.
A capacity gap you can name. Someone is doing the work but there are four applications due in six weeks. That is a real overflow problem with a real solution.
You want the research, not the writing. Often the better half. A consultant who hands back a qualified funder list and a repeatable method to maintain it leaves you with a capability rather than one proposal.
If you would like help working out which of those you have — or you need onboarding, training or workflow help around the software side of it — that is what our consulting work covers.
Common questions
Should a grant writer be paid a percentage of grants won?
No. Commission-based fundraising compensation is contrary to the ethical standards of the major professional associations in the field, and many funders explicitly prohibit grant funds being used that way. It also creates the wrong incentive — volume over fit — which is exactly what damages funder relationships.
Is it cheaper to hire a grant writer or buy software?
They solve different problems. Software helps you find and track funders; a writer produces proposals. If your applications are going out but not landing, the issue is usually fit or capacity, and neither a writer nor a subscription fixes that on its own.
What should a grant writing contract include?
Scope by number of applications rather than hours where possible, who does the research, who assembles attachments, who owns the drafts, what happens to work in progress if the engagement ends, and an explicit statement that payment is not contingent on grants awarded.
Can a consultant do the research as well as the writing?
Usually yes, and it is often the better half of the engagement. Prospect research is where most small-shop grant programs actually fail, and a consultant who hands back a qualified funder list plus a repeatable method leaves you with a capability rather than one proposal.
This post is part of the guide to the growing fundraising stack ($250k – $1M raised).